Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(2): 1009-1016, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37857899

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The coracoclavicular (CC) loop stabilization technique is proposed for unstable distal clavicular fractures. This study aims to compare single and double CC loop stabilizations and evaluate differences in functional and radiographic outcomes between them. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial involving 46 patients who sustained unstable distal clavicular fractures between April 2017 and 2019. The participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the single CC loop stabilization group (n = 23) or the double CC loop stabilization group (n = 23). We assessed their Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), and pain level. Additionally, we recorded data on time to union, CC distance, and any complications. RESULTS: The single CC loop group demonstrated a shorter operative time and significantly higher Constant score than the double CC loop group at 1 month (77.32 ± 5.65 vs. 71.91 ± 8.33; p = 0.016) and 3 months (86.17 ± 4.05 vs. 81.13 ± 6.34; p = 0.009) postoperatively. However, there was no differences in the ASES score, time to union or CC distance restoration between two groups. Implant irritation was observed in the double CC loop group (26.1%), but there were no cases requiring revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Both single and double CC loop stabilization demonstrated favorable outcomes, including a high union rate and minimal complications. Single CC loop stabilization showed slightly better early functional outcomes, reduced implant-related irritation, and shorter operative times.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Clavícula/diagnóstico por imagem , Clavícula/cirurgia , Placas Ósseas , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 97: 107467, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35952568

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The main socioeconomic area in Thailand has been the agricultural endemic area, where brucellosis infection, one of the bacterial infectious diseases has been an overlooked diagnose. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 50-year-old Thai woman was admitted to the hospital with pain and limited motion in her left shoulder. These symptoms have been prolonging with progressive clinical for two years. The physical examination revealed stiffness in all directions. The glenohumeral joint appeared to be narrowing on radiographic evaluation. The multiple loculate mass and septic glenohumeral joint arthritis were seen by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, the Brucellosis investigation specificity was Brucella IgM/IgG positive. This patient was treated with a combination of surgery and oral antimicrobial medication. We decided to perform a total shoulder arthroplasty because the patient was still in pain and stiff from secondary arthritis. DISCUSSION: As a result of the late treatment for osteoarticular involvement, secondary osteoarthritis develops until leading to significant cartilage loss. Therefore, even medical treatment and surgical debridement, the patient still suffers from secondary osteoarthritis, which causes pain and limited activity. The arthroplasty treatment method plays a role in the treatment of function following secondary osteoarthritis infection. CONCLUSION: The role of arthroplasty was selected in the treatment of brucellosis osteoarticular involvement, which is an uncommon and difficult to identify condition that can lead to maltreatment. So that this case report offers the treatment option if the patient was not responsible for the medical and surgical debridement therapy with secondary osteoarthritis at the glenohumeral joint, even though the brucellosis infection condition had completely resolved.

3.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 27: 101810, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35282657

RESUMO

The specific meniscus injury pattern were divided into many patterns. Nowadays, the meniscus root injury, radial tear meniscus, bucket handle tear meniscus and Ramp lesion were particularly focused on many way to manage and still controversial a lot of issues. Meniscus root tears (MRTs) and Ramp lesion are the most ignored, or misdiagnosed causes of chronic knee pain. Most patients delayed seeking treatment, consequently resulting in cartilage loss, and leading to the condition progressing to osteoarthritis knee. This has resulted in the rate of MR and Ramp repair increase significantly. The bucket handle meniscus tear trend to strong saving the anatomical meniscus and avoid to menisectomy. This article, on the other hand, will reveal you how to save and secure a nearly native meniscus fixation. In case of the radial meniscus, the partial meniscectomy is still used to treat this type of injury today, but it does not prevent degenerative changes from occurring, which can lead to unfavorable outcomes. Meniscal repair is a popular procedure for treating radial tears as an alternative to surgery. However, this pattern of meniscus tear can be difficult to repair and has a high failure rate, the arthroscopic meniscus repair techniques are published.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA